Thursday, 11 October 2012

Looper


Rian Johnson’s ‘Looper’ brings us to Kansas City 2042, a part of time and space that has become something of a dumping ground to be used by crime syndicates of the future. The logical choice for future mobsters is now to hire assassins in the past (bear with me), and present them their targets by means of by-then-invented time travel.

It is the job of the loopers, who count Joe (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) among their number, to execute those who appear in front of them and dispose of the body so as to leave no trace in the future.

But there is a catch; as Gordon-Levitt’s narration informs us, this new technology is so very illegal that said organisations cannot risk their loopers coming back to haunt them, and a time will come where they must execute their thirty-year-older selves. When the time does come for our protagonist to end his own loop and literally face his own mortality he hesitates, facilitating the escape of his older self (Bruce Willis) into a world he should not inhabit.

Now Joe is well aware of the dire consequences of his inaction for himself (and by this I do actually mean himself), and sets about tracking down his 2072 counterpart who also has a grizzly task in mind to put his own house in order.

Johnson provides the audience with a measured glimpse into the lives of 2042’s criminal underbelly – not so much that new and interesting technology is thrust at us indiscriminately, but enough to satisfy us that there is substance, a concreteness, to his futuristic city. On this front it succeeds where the likes of ‘I, Robot’ have failed; scratch beneath the surface and you find just the amount of societal and technological advancements to satisfy the conventions of the genre, such as the eye-drop drugs with which the city is rampant, but no affectations included for their own sake.

Gordon-Levitt’s Joe is a conflicted man; embracing the perks of the life of a small-time mobster whilst also preparing for retirement away from the city. It is testament to his performance, as well as the work of Johnson’s make-up and CGI teams, that his scenes with Willis really induce belief that before you stand two slices of one temporal entity. In particular, one scene in the men’s (or man’s) favourite diner sees Willis’ trademark glare emanate from both sides of the table simultaneously as their diverging motives become clear, throwing up all kinds of philosophical dilemmas in the process. Again, the trick is for the complexity and to impress rather than to overwhelm, and Johnson – no stranger to the complicated narrative after his labyrinthine debut feature ‘Brick’ - gets the balance just right.

The success of the science fiction blockbuster often depends not upon the intelligibility or otherwise of the content, but rather the sincerity with which the material is presented – and ‘Looper’ undoubtedly succeeds on the second count if not necessarily the first. The narrative accelerates violently following Gordon-Levitt’s opening exposition meaning that any metaphysical concern are never more than fleeting, indeed the silence that greets the end credits emphasises what a relentless, twisting ride Johnson has just conducted – this is decidedly action-led story-telling.

Most surprising is that, despite an escalating sci-fi plot that eventually owes as much to ‘Chronicle’ as ‘Twelve Monkeys’, the film nevertheless displays commendable restraint in not allowing its concept to overrun the story. It tempers its visual tricks and cat-and-mouse plot with a creeping moral centrepiece, so that, by the climax, any conceptual troubles you might have experienced are left very much in the past.




Monday, 9 July 2012

The Midnight Beast


The latest part of e4’s continued assault on the perceived ‘alternative comedy’ demographic is ‘The Midnight Beast’ - in which a trio of layabouts do a bit of trying to make their name in South-West London’s music scene, a bit of trying to get off with women and a bit of being wacky and weird. I may as well say now that I didn’t like this programme; I didn’t like any of the characters because they were all morons, I didn’t like any of the jokes because they weren’t particularly funny and I shan’t be watching any more of it.

Its not that I’m against what e4 do; by their nature they will  have their hits and their misses and, for the most part, the former are worth the latter. However, the difference between the fortunes of this and its Monday-night predecessor ‘Cardinal Burns’ is their origins: ‘Cardinal Burns’ – brilliantly strange sketches executed to perfection by their creators, ‘The Midnight Beasts’ – a half-baked comedy written seemingly only so as to include the musical source material which gained a popular following on Youtube.

These might have been aimed broadly at the same audience, but in this case the writers have crossed the very real line between the amusingly bizarre and the downright annoying. They crammed three of their comedy pop songs into one programme, and where ‘Flight of the Conchords’ was elevated by its genuinely catchy musical interludes this had me wincing at the lyrics ‘I kicked a shark in the face.’ That’s about its level.

Take a bit of that and piece it together with some plot about trying to get their songs on a playstation game, a manager doing a decent Liam Gallagher/Super Hans impression and an over-egged Withnail-like desperation for any sustenance (two characters fight over a cherry lip balm) and there you have it – a properly rubbish first episode of what will more than likely be a properly rubbish programme. Get back, The Midnight Beast! Back to the internet from whence you came!